End of Semeter Reflection - Fall 14
Each semester of seminary, I post a reflection. I’m grateful for those who have followed
these posts and offered encouragement along the way. I’m 7/8ths done, so this is my second to last
post!
Senior Capstone was a journey down seminary-lane with people
who have become incredible traveling friends.
During this class I realized that seminary has been an incredible gift
to me, a gift which many people have contributed to (some knowingly and some
unknowingly): the WI Conference of the United Methodist Church, the Dayton
family, the alumni of United, UMC Board of Higher Ed, Paul Christensen, Patt
Christensen, Jane Souhrada, and Cheryl and Rick Lamon. I
certainly got an education/training, but the greater gift was the blessing of my
seminary friendships. Every time I was
on campus, I just tried to soak in the presence of my peers, realizing that this
won’t last forever.
I took Social Ethics at Bethel Seminary (Southern Baptist) because I knew I needed to expand my dialogue partners on social issues and learn to engage the evangelical community. As a Methodist, the roots of my tradition are evangelical. When in college, I was deeply involved in and influenced by evangelical organizations (Campus Crusade and Intervarsity). But over time, I have made some shifts in my spirituality, and because of that, I have become unaware of the conversations happening within evangelicalism about social issues.
I had two classes this semester—Senior Capstone and Social
Ethics (which I took at Bethel Seminary).
This pic of line dancing in the café is so illustrative of my seminary experience. |
I took Social Ethics at Bethel Seminary (Southern Baptist) because I knew I needed to expand my dialogue partners on social issues and learn to engage the evangelical community. As a Methodist, the roots of my tradition are evangelical. When in college, I was deeply involved in and influenced by evangelical organizations (Campus Crusade and Intervarsity). But over time, I have made some shifts in my spirituality, and because of that, I have become unaware of the conversations happening within evangelicalism about social issues.
I have to admit I went into the class with assumptions; many
turned out to be untrue. For example, not
all evangelicals are fundamentalists.
And their faith is far more dynamic than I expected—they are changing
their minds on many issues (gender roles, creation care, etc.). And they are humble about their evolving
faith. I am very grateful for the
experience at Bethel and my fellow students there.
Here’s where I found the stumbling blocks in dialoguing…
First, they have an unspoken understanding about how to
approach the Bible. It took me awhile to
catch on. They call it “high view of
Scripture,” which essentially means they must apply the same level of
seriousness to all parts of Scripture, not prioritizing, like mainline
Christians do. This requires them finding
a way to deal with icky Scripture—like head coverings for women. I
simply say something like head coverings is a cultural thing and isn’t an indicator of
God’s eternal message, but I watched classmates do Scriptural acrobatics with passages like this, twisting and turning in order to find a way out.
Second, they interpret all text through a larger theological lens: the metanarrative of the creation, fall, salvation/atonement, and re-consummation. I have a different Biblical metanarrative at work—belonging, calling, God refusing separation/salvation, and indwelling. When you are reading the Bible through a completely different metanarrative than your dialogue partner, it's hard to have the same conversation about how the Bible narrative speaks to social issues. Speaking of having the same conversation....
Second, they interpret all text through a larger theological lens: the metanarrative of the creation, fall, salvation/atonement, and re-consummation. I have a different Biblical metanarrative at work—belonging, calling, God refusing separation/salvation, and indwelling. When you are reading the Bible through a completely different metanarrative than your dialogue partner, it's hard to have the same conversation about how the Bible narrative speaks to social issues. Speaking of having the same conversation....
Third, on some social issues, the mainline church and
evangelical church are indeed having the same conversation, like creation care,
economic justice, racism, etc. But on
other issues, we are both talking about the issue but having different
conversations about it. For example,
they are discussing egalitarianism and complementarianism when it comes to
gender roles, whereas my type of Christians are discussing the gender binary. Evangelicals are grappling with whether
GLBTQI relationships are sinful, while mainliners are working to create
reconciliation ministries and celebrating same-gendered relationships. Same issue, different conversations.
Taking this class at Bethel and two other classes at Luther Seminary were incredible opportunities. I'm grateful the Minnesota seminaries work together in a consortium so students can take credits across schools for our degrees. This feels like an example of Christian unity.
Taking this class at Bethel and two other classes at Luther Seminary were incredible opportunities. I'm grateful the Minnesota seminaries work together in a consortium so students can take credits across schools for our degrees. This feels like an example of Christian unity.
Comments
Post a Comment